“Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom.” – Thomas Jefferson
“Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty.” – Plato
“The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant.” – Maximilien Robespierre
“When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know, the end result is tyranny and oppression no matter how holy the motives.” – Robert A. Heinlein
Health care reform is a hotly debated issue today, as it has been for quite a bit of America’s history. Benjamin Rush, one of the endorsers of the Declaration of Independence, cautioned in 1787 that medicinal flexibility should have been incorporated into the American Constitution. Without this security, Rush cautioned that the therapeutic foundation would actually advance – the same number of humankind’s establishments do – into an abusive tyranny. His words, resounding from more than 200 years prior, ring strikingly genuine today:
Benjamin Rush, Founding Father
“The Constitution of this Republic should make special provision for medical freedom. To restrict the art of healing to one class will constitute the Bastille of medical science. All such laws are un-American and despotic. … Unless we put medical freedom into the constitution the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship and force people who wish doctors and treatment of their own choice to submit to only what the dictating outfit offers.”
The spirit of managerial scientific control that drives this mammoth is condensed in the expressions of Frederick Taylor, a pioneer in “logical administration.” As Taylor expressed in 1907, “Excessively incredible freedom results in a substantial number of individuals turning out badly who might be correct on the off chance that they had been constrained into great propensities.” This soul of semi unselfish experimental control starts to blur away towards the higher positions of the framework, in any case.
The potential for medical oppression that Benjamin Rush saw more than 200 years prior solidified when the Rockefeller and Carnegie establishments changed the American therapeutic foundation in the mid twentieth Century. They endeavored to make an arrangement of educating to fabricate an anticipated, standard after gathering of experts to authorize the foundation regulations. Also, charge absolved establishments – through their gift making power – can shape the thought circle from which therapeutic examination rises, or is stifled.
The domineering medicinal services model as communicated by “Obamacare” is being actualized as a feature of a bigger worldwide project. The World Health Organization reported as of late that it would like to actualize – by means of a U.N. determination – “all inclusive wellbeing scope” over the globe in satisfaction of its Millennium Development Goals. The Rockefeller Foundation is working with WHO in the venture. “There is a worldwide development towards UHC (Universal Health Care) and it is social affair energy,” said Judith Rodin, President of the Rockefeller Foundation.
On the off chance that you don’t need the sort of consideration that the allopathic foundation recommends, be prepared to confront the results.
A Minnesota mother was as of late conveyed to court over declining chemotherapy for her 8 year old little girl. A specialist clearly reported her to CPS. She was “… requested into court and told in the event that they didn’t work with them on a treatment arrangement, they would lose custody of Sarah.”
The movie “First Do No Harm” starring Meryl Streep is the story of one woman’s struggle against a narrow-minded medical establishment.
Synopsis: When Lori Reimuller learns that her young son Robbie has epilepsy, she first trusts the judgment of the hospital staff in how best to bring it under control. As Robbie’s health slides radically downhill, however, she becomes frustrated and desperate, and so does her own research into the existing literature on treatments. When she decides to try an alternative treatment called the Ketogenic Diet, devised long ago by a doctor from Johns Hopkins, she is met with narrow-minded resistance from Robbie’s doctor, who is prepared to take legal action to prevent Lori from removing him from the hospital. This movie is an indictment of those in the medical profession who discuss only the treatment options they favor. Several of the minor characters are portrayed by people who have been not just helped, but cured by the Ketogenic diet.
Another case included a Pennsylvania mother who declined to immunize her kid, bringing about a visit from CPS.
A 2009 case in which a 13 year old kid’s guardians denied chemo brought about a judgment of “therapeutic disregard,” preventing the privilege from claiming his guardians to deny treatment on religious grounds.
The primary concern is this: Even if the restorative foundation had our best advantage on the most fundamental level, what happens when their science isn’t right? What happens when it is skewed for the partnerships that are firmly adjusted to them? What sort of harm is done when it is generally implemented?
Benjamin Rush predicted this risk, and the time has come to face it for the truth it has ended up.
You will not believe some of these true incidents with a mother and her own child being threatened to be taken away:
Scan down on this particular article to: National Board of Health – The Other Side of the Question , As It Appears to Thomas Morgan and take a read at this: ttps://news.google.com/newspapers?id=e2NKAAAAIBAJ&sjid=RIYMAAAAIBAJ&pg=2594,3655329&dq=benjamin+rush+medical+freedom&hl=en