ENSLAVED RELIGIOUS FREEDOM

“It’s impossible to have religious freedom in any nation where the churches are licensed to the government.” 

When a church accepts the 501c3 status, that church:

  • Waives its freedom of speech
  • Waives its freedom of religion
  • Waives its rights to influence legislators and the legislation they craft
  • Waives it constitutionally guaranteed rights
  • Is no longer free to speak to the vital issues of the day
  • Becomes controlled by a spirit of fear that if it doesn’t toe the line with the IRS it will lose the tax-exempt status
  • Becomes a state-owned church
Religion can’t be free on the off chance that you need to pay the legislature, through tax assessment, to practice it. Since churches  aren’t assessable in any case, why do as such a significant number of them go to the IRS and look for authorization to be expense absolved? It happens out of:
Lack of knowledge (“We didn’t know any better”)
Temporary logic rationale (“Everyone else is doing it”)
Proficient exhortation (numerous lawyers and CPAs suggest it)
Does the law require, or even support, a congregation to compose as a 501c3? To answer that question how about we swing to what the IRS itself needs to state.
NOTE: Places of worship Need Not Apply
Keeping in mind the end goal to be considered for duty excluded status by the IRS an association must round out and submit IRS Form 1023 and 1024. Nonetheless, note what the IRS says in regards to houses of worship and church services, in Publication 557:
A few associations are not required to record Form 1023. These include:
Holy places, interchurch associations of nearby units of a congregation, traditions or relationship of holy places, or coordinated helpers of a congregation, for example, a men’s or ladies’ association, religious school, mission society, or youth gather. These associations are absolved automatically if they meet the necessities of segment 501(c)(3).
Houses of worship Are “Naturally Tax-Exempt”
As per IRS Code § 508(c)(1)(A):
Exceptional principles regarding area 501(c)(3) associations.
(a) New associations must tell secretary that they are applying for acknowledgment of segment 501(c)(3) status.
(c) Exceptions.
(1) Mandatory exemptions. Subsections (an) and (b) should not make a difference to—
(A) places of worship, their incorporated assistants, and traditions or relationship of chapels.
This is alluded to as the “required exemption” run the show. Subsequently, we see from the IRS’ claim distributions, and the duty code, that it is totally superfluous for any congregation to apply for expense excluded status. In the IRS’ possess words a congregation “is consequently impose excluded.”
Places of worship Are “Consequently Tax-Deductible”
Furthermore, shouldn’t something be said about duty deductibility? Doesn’t a congregation still need to end up distinctly a 501c3 with the goal that commitments to it can be taken as a duty derivation? The answer is no! As indicated by IRS Publication 526:
Associations That Qualify To Receive Deductible Contributions
You can deduct your commitments just on the off chance that you make them to a qualified association. To end up distinctly a qualified association, most associations other than places of worship and governments, as depicted underneath, must apply to the IRS.
In the IRS’ possess words a congregation “is consequently assess deductible.”
Houses of worship Have a Mandatory Exception To Filing Tax Returns
Not just is it totally pointless for any congregation to look for 501c3 status, to do as such turns into an allow of locale to the IRS by any congregation that acquires that State support. In the expressions of Steve Nestor, IRS Sr. Income Officer (ret.):
“I am by all account not the only IRS representative who’s asked why houses of worship go to the administration and look for consent to be exempted from a duty they didn’t owe in any case, and to look for an assessment deductible status that they’ve generally had at any rate. A large number of us have wondered about how church pioneers need to be directed and controlled by an organization of government that most Americans have implored would quite recently escape their lives. Holy places are in an incredibly special position, yet they don’t appear to know or value the ramifications of what it would intend to be free of government control.”
WHY SHOULD YOU LOSE RIGHTS AND DOES ANYBODY TELL YOU THIS?
Most houses of worship in America have composed as “501c3 expense excluded religious associations.” This is a genuinely late pattern that has just been continuing for around fifty years. Chapels were just added to segment 501c3 of the duty code in 1954. We can express gratitude toward Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson for that. Johnson was no partner of the congregation. As a major aspect of his political plan, Johnson had it at the top of the priority list to hush the congregation and dispose of the huge impact the congregation had dependably had on molding “open strategy.”
Despite the fact that Johnson proffered this as “some help” to places of worship, the support likewise accompanied strings connected (more like shackles). One need not look far to see the staggering impacts 501c3 acknowledgment has had to the congregation, and the ensuing confinements set upon any 501c3 church. 501c3 places of worship are disallowed from tending to, in any substantial way, the crucial issues of the day.
For a 501c3 church to straightforwardly stand up, or sort out contrary to, anything that the administration pronounces “legitimate,” regardless of the possibility that it is shameless (e.g. fetus removal, homosexuality, and so forth.), that congregation will imperil its assessment excluded status. The 501c3 has had a “chilling impact” upon the free discourse privileges of the congregation. LBJ was a clever and shrewd government official who appeared to well-acknowledge how effortlessly large portions of the pastorate would offer out.
Did the congregation ever need to look for consent from the legislature to be absolved from expenses? Were holy places preceding 1954 assessable? No, chapels have never been assessable. To be assessable a congregation would initially should be under the locale, and in this manner under the burdening power, of the legislature. The First Amendment unmistakably puts the congregation outside the ward of the common government: “Congress should make NO LAW regarding a foundation of religion, nor restricting the free practice thereof.”
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s